Lee Phillips Lee Phillips's Profile Page

Lee Phillips Lee Phillips

About me

Analytics-Con-301 Online Test - Analytics-Con-301 Prüfungs

Übrigens, Sie können die vollständige Version der Pass4Test Analytics-Con-301 Prüfungsfragen aus dem Cloud-Speicher herunterladen: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1txASyDs8OwhhaF2dv0hKqLXswpFWZyi6

Das Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Zertifikat kann nicht nur Ihre Fähigkeiten, sondern auch Ihre Fachkenntnisse und Erfahrungen beweisen. Der Boss hat Sie doch nicht umsonst eingestellt. Zur Zeit braucht IT-Branche eine zuverlässige Ressourcen zur Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Zertifizierungsprüfung. Pass4Test ist eine gute Wahl. Sie können die Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Prüfung in kurzer Zeit bestehen, ohne viel Zeit und Energie zu verwenden, und eine glänzende Zukunft haben.

Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Prüfungsplan:

Thema
Einzelheiten

Thema 1

Data Management: This part focuses on establishing governance and support for published content. Tableau Consultants are expected to manage data security, publish and maintain data sources and workbooks, and oversee content access. It includes applying governance best practices, using metadata APIs, and supporting administration functions to maintain data integrity and accessibility.

Thema 2

Data Analysis: This domain targets Tableau Consultants to plan and prepare data connections effectively. It includes recommending data transformation strategies, designing row-level security (RLS) data structures, and implementing advanced data connections such as Web Data Connectors and Tableau Bridge. Skills in specifying granularity and aggregation strategies for data sources across Tableau products are emphasized.

Thema 3

IT Management: This domain measures skills related to managing Tableau environments. It includes planning server upgrades, recommending deployment solutions (on-premise or cloud), and ensuring alignment between technical and business requirements for analytics infrastructure. It also involves troubleshooting and optimizing system performance relevant to Tableau Server and Cloud deployments.

Thema 4

Business Consulting: For Tableau Consultants, this section involves designing and troubleshooting calculations and workbooks to meet advanced analytical use cases. It covers selecting appropriate chart types, applying Tableau’s order of operations in calculations, building interactivity into dashboards, and optimizing workbook performance by resolving resource-intensive queries and other design-related issues.

Thema 5

Data Visualization: This section evaluates the Tableau Consultant’s ability to design effective visual analytics solutions. It involves creating dashboards and visual reports that enhance user understanding, employing techniques like dynamic actions and advanced chart types, and ensuring performance optimization for an interactive user experience.

>> Analytics-Con-301 Online Test <<

Analytics-Con-301 Pass Dumps & PassGuide Analytics-Con-301 Prüfung & Analytics-Con-301 Guide

Wofür zögern Sie noch? Sie haben nur eine Chance. Jetzt können Sie die vollständige Version zur Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Zertifizierungsprüfung bekommen. Sobald Sie die Pass4Test klicken, wird Ihr kleiner Traum verwirklicht werden. Sie haben die besten Schulungsunterlagen zur Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Zertifizierungsprüfung gekriegen. Benutzen Sie beruhigt unsere Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Prüfungsfragen und Antworten, werden Sie sicher die Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Prüfung bestehen.

Salesforce Certified Tableau Consultant Analytics-Con-301 Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q18-Q23):

18. Frage
A client uses Tableau Data Management and notices that when they view a data source, they sometimes see a different count of workbooks in the Connected Workbooks tab compared to the lineage count in Tableau Catalog.
What is the cause of this discrepancy?

A. Some workbooks have not been viewed by enough users yet.
B. Some workbooks have been connected to the data source, but do not use any fields from it.
C. Some Creators have connected to the data source in Tableau Desktop but have not yet published a workbook.
D. Some of the workbooks connected to the data source are not visible to the user due to permissions.

Antwort: D

Begründung:
The discrepancy between the count of workbooks in the Connected Workbooks tab and the lineage count in Tableau Catalog can occur because of user permissions. In Tableau Data Management, the visibility of connected workbooks is subject to the permissions set by administrators. If a user does not have permission to view certain workbooks, they will not see them listed in the Connected Workbooks tab, even though these workbooks are part of the data source's lineage and are counted in Tableau Catalog.
References: This explanation is based on the functionality of Tableau Data Management and Tableau Catalog, which includes managing user permissions and access to workbooks. The information is supported by Tableau's official documentation on data management and security practices1.

19. Frage
A multi-national company wants to have a Tableau dashboard that will provide country-level information for both its forecast summaries and year-on-year metrics. The company wants to toggle between these two views while leaving main key performance indicators (KPIs) visible on the main dashboard.
Which method is the most efficient in achieving the company's requirements?

A. Create a single worksheet with all the measures required for both the forecast summary and the year-on-year views.
. Create a Boolean parameter and a corresponding calculated field with the following calculation: True.
. Add a blank dashboard object and in the Layout tab, check the box for "Control visibility using value" and select the parameter you created.
B. Create a dashboard with the sheets containing the main KPIs and the forecast summary worksheet.
. Duplicate this dashboard and replace the forecast view worksheet with the year-on-year metrics worksheet.
. Add navigation buttons to both dashboards.
C. Create a parameter that accepts values from a list that contains "Forecast View" and "Year-on-Year View."
. Right-click the parameter and select Add to Sheet for both worksheets.
. Navigate back to the dashboard and to the upper corner of the two worksheets.
. Enable the Use as Filter option.
D. Create a Boolean parameter with the two names of the views as aliases and a corresponding calculated field with the following calculation: True.
. Add the forecast summary sheet to the dashboard and add the year-on-year metrics sheet to the same dashboard as a Floating dashboard object.

Antwort: D

Begründung:
. Add the calculated fields as a Detail under the Marks card of the floating view, create a "Change Parameter" action, and set the
"Target Parameter" and "Source Fields" to the parameter and calculated field you created.
. Check the box for "Control visibility using value" in the Layout tab of the floating view and select the parameter you created.
Explanation:
The most efficient method for toggling between two views (forecast summaries and year-on-year metrics) while keeping main KPIs visible involves using a parameter and calculated fields for controlling visibility:
Create a Boolean Parameter: This parameter will have two aliases representing the two views ("Forecast View" and "Year-on-Year View"). This allows the user to select which view they wish to see directly from the dashboard.
Calculated Field: Create a calculated field that always returns True. This field acts as a constant placeholder to enable the visibility control tied to the parameter.
Dashboard Setup: Place both the forecast summary and the year-on-year metrics sheets on the dashboard. Set the year-on-year metrics sheet as a floating object over the forecast summary.
Visibility Control: Use the "Control visibility using value" option in the Layout tab for the floating year-on-year metrics view. Tie this setting to the Boolean parameter so that changing the parameter will show or hide this view without affecting the main KPIs displayed on the dashboard.
Interactivity: Implement a "Change Parameter" dashboard action where selecting different options in the dashboard (e.g., clicking on certain parts) triggers the parameter to change, thus toggling the visible view.
References
This method leverages Tableau's dashboard interactivity features including parameters, calculated fields, and visibility settings, as recommended in Tableau's user guide on dynamic dashboard design.

20. Frage
A client needs to design row-level security (RLS) measures for their reports. The client does not currently have Tableau Data Management Add-on, and it may be an option in the future.
What should the consultant recommend as the safest and easiest way to manage for the long term?

A. Create User filters for each report using a table joined to its data source and using the option Apply to All Sheet Using the Data Source.
B. Create User filters based on data policies and apply them to a published data source.
C. Create User filters based on data policies and apply them to views using set filters and option Server
/Create User Filter.
D. Create User filters in each view of each report using set filters and option Server/Create User Filter.

Antwort: B

Begründung:
For implementing row-level security (RLS) without the Tableau Data Management Add-on, the best approach is to integrate user filters into the published data source:
* Creating User Filters on Published Data Source: This method involves defining user filters that apply directly to the data source before it is published to the Tableau Server. This ensures that any workbook or view leveraging this data source inherently respects the row-level security settings.
* To implement this, create a calculated field in Tableau that defines the security logic, typically using a formula that references user functions (like USERNAME() or ISMEMBEROF()). Drag this field to the Filters shelf and configure it to match the security rules (who can see what data).
* Once configured, publish the data source to Tableau Server with these filters in place. This approach centralizes security management, making it easier to maintain and update security policies as they are applied universally to all workbooks using this data source.
This strategy is safe as it reduces the risk of accidental data exposure through individual workbook misconfiguration and simplifies long-term maintenance of security policies.
References
This method follows Tableau's best practices for implementing row-level security as detailed in Tableau's security management resources. It ensures robust, maintainable security measures that scale with organizational needs without requiring additional add-ons.

21. Frage
An online sales company has a table data source that contains Order Date. Products ship on the first day of each month for all orders from the previous month.
The consultant needs to know the average number of days that a customer must wait before a product is shipped.
Which calculation should the consultant use?

A. Calc1: DATETRUNC ('day', DATEADD('week', 4, [Order Date]))
Calc2: AVG([Order Date] - [Calc1])
B. Calc1: DATETRUNC ('month', DATEADD ('month', 1, [Order Date]))
Calc2: AVG(DATEDIFF ('day', [Order Date], [Calc1]))
C. Calc1: DATETRUNC ('month', DATEADD('month', 1, [Order Date]))
Calc2: AVG(DATEDIFF ('week', [Order Date], [Calc1]))
D. Calc1: DATETRUNC ('day', DATEADD ('day', 31, [Order Date]))
Calc2: AVG ([Order Date] - [Calc1])

Antwort: B

Begründung:
The correct calculation to determine the average number of days a customer must wait before a product is shipped is to first find the shipping date, which is the first day of the following month after the order date. This is done using DATETRUNC('month', DATEADD('month', 1, [Order Date])). Then, the average difference in days between the order date and the shipping date is calculated using AVG(DATEDIFF('day', [Order Date], [Calc1])). This approach ensures that the average wait time is calculated in days, which is the most precise measure for this scenario.
References: The solution is based on Tableau's date functions and their use in calculating differences between dates, which are well-documented in Tableau's official learning resources and consultant documents12.
To calculate the average waiting days from order placement to shipping, where shipping occurs on the first day of the following month:
Calculate Shipping Date (Calc1): Use the DATEADD function to add one month to the order date, then apply DATETRUNC to truncate this date to the first day of that month. This represents the shipping date for each order.
Calculate Average Wait Time (Calc2): Use DATEDIFF to calculate the difference in days between the original order date and the calculated shipping date (Calc1). Then, use AVG to average these differences across all orders, giving the average number of days customers wait before their products are shipped.
References:
Date Functions in Tableau: Functions like DATEADD, DATETRUNC, and DATEDIFF are used to manipulate and calculate differences between dates, crucial for creating metrics that depend on time intervals, such as customer wait times in this scenario.

22. Frage
A client has a Tableau Cloud deployment. Currently, dashboards are available only to internal users.
The client needs to embed interactive Tableau visualizations on their public website.
Data is < 5,000 rows, updated infrequently via manual refresh.
Cost is a priority.
Which product should the client use?

A. Tableau Server licensed per core
B. Tableau Public
C. Tableau Embedded Analytics
D. Tableau Cloud licensed per user

Antwort: B

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
Tableau documentation explains:
Tableau Public
* Free platform.
* Allows public sharing and embedding of fully interactive dashboards.
* Ideal for small datasets and infrequent updates.
* Does not require user-based licensing.
* Embedding is unrestricted because all content is publicly visible.
This perfectly matches the scenario:
# Public-facing website
# Low cost priority
# Small dataset
# Manual, infrequent updates
Why the other options are incorrect:
A). Tableau Cloud (per user)
* Requires paid licenses.
* Does not allow unrestricted public embedding without expensive add-ons.
* Designed for secure internal use, not public web-wide embedding.
C). Tableau Embedded Analytics
* A paid embedding solution requiring proper licensing.
* Designed for large-scale, secure, programmatic embedding - too costly for this use case.
D). Tableau Server (per core)
* Requires server infrastructure & licensing.
* Far more expensive than Tableau Public.
Thus, Tableau Public is the correct, cost-effective solution.
* Tableau Public documentation describing free embedding for public websites.
* Comparison guides showing Tableau Cloud/Server require licensing for embedding.
* Public vs. Enterprise Tableau deployment best practices.

23. Frage
......

Hier möchte ich über eine Kernfrage sprechen. Alle Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Zertifizierungsprüfungen sind wichtig. Im Zeitalter, wo die Information hoch entwickelt ist, ist Pass4Test nur eine der zahlreichen Websites. Warum wählen viele Leute Pass4Test? Denn die Prüfungsmaterialien von Pass4Test werden Ihnen sicher beim Bestehen der Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Prüfung helfen. Pass4Test aktualisiert ständig seine Materialien und Trainingsinstrumente. Mit den Prüfungsfragen und Antworten zur Salesforce Analytics-Con-301 Zertifizierungsprüfung von Pass4Test werden Sie mehr Selbstbewusstsein für die Prüfung haben. Sie brauchen sich keine Sorgen um das Risiko der Prüfung zu machen. Sie können ganz mühlos die Prüfung bestehen.

Analytics-Con-301 Prüfungs: https://www.pass4test.de/Analytics-Con-301.html

P.S. Kostenlose und neue Analytics-Con-301 Prüfungsfragen sind auf Google Drive freigegeben von Pass4Test verfügbar: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1txASyDs8OwhhaF2dv0hKqLXswpFWZyi6

0

Course Enrolled

0

Course Completed

Lee Phillips Lee Phillips

About me

0

0

Sign in